Don’t even start with this “y so intolerant of intolerance?!?” BS. Tolerance is only a virtue when it’s for inherent traits such as race, sex, gender, religion or culture. Not a full grown adult calling for the elimination of anyone they dislike. One is a human trait and the other is a choice to do evil.
Coming to the defense of nazis doesn’t make you compassionate it makes you an accomplice to their inevitable violence. Fascism is an existential threat to civilization and these monsters are actively acting on their violent rhetoric.
I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action."
Like it’s a novel? 🙄 I read every one of your comments in this thread.
Frankly. I think you remaining speechless is for the best if you’re clicked this thread and decide that those literally in the process of committing violent acts are the ones who need to be shielded. “Kicking them out of the bar” isn’t a solution in the slightest and the more you double down the more I see just another Nazi sitting at their table.
Me: “I’m not saying tolerate them, I’m saying dehumanization of any human isn’t acceptable.”
You: “Why are you Defending Nazis?”
Your responses are so far removed from what I was saying that I can’t even take it as criticism, you’ve assigned me a position I didn’t take, and are trying to take me to task over it.
Good job man, you won the argument you’re having with yourself. Kudos.
I’m not saying tolerate them, I’m saying dehumanization of any human isn’t acceptable. It’s kinda fucked that the reason y’all wanna dehumanize them is because they dehumanize others.
The first sentence qualifier doesn’t make the second sentence any less of a defense. The fact that you can’t see that is historical ignorance.
Anyway, I tried to make it clear that the problem I have is the dehumanization. And at no point did I afford them anything I wouldn’t afford literally any human.
If you take offense with me saying that humans deserve to be treated as humans, I think that says more about you than me but I admit my opinion on that is more than a little biased.
That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be dealt with in other ways. Kick them out of stores, refuse to let them take part in society, police their actions (or attempted actions.)
There are many ways to deal with them without dehumanization.
There are many ways to deal with them without dehumanization.
None that slow them down, much less stop them. They are flying swasitkas and self identifying as nazis. They clearly don’t care if they are part of “polite society”. Was the Third Reich defeated with shame? You’re playing with monopoly money here.
An eye for an eye.
Out of sight out of mind. Forcing them out of the store only means they abuse victims down the street. It’s not a solution.
Nazis don’t need an eye based provocation, their entire philosophy is based around blinding others. There is no offramp for the violence they execute since their hate and propaganda will always fuel another attack. They went to a pride parade because the mere existcane of minorities is seen as legitimate threat to the. There is no appealing to the humanity of those who gleefully call and execute violence indiscriminately.
Advocating for the humanity of Nazis is to deny the humanity of their victims.
Don’t even start with this “y so intolerant of intolerance?!?” BS. Tolerance is only a virtue when it’s for inherent traits such as race, sex, gender, religion or culture. Not a full grown adult calling for the elimination of anyone they dislike. One is a human trait and the other is a choice to do evil.
Coming to the defense of nazis doesn’t make you compassionate it makes you an accomplice to their inevitable violence. Fascism is an existential threat to civilization and these monsters are actively acting on their violent rhetoric.
-Dr. King
You should be fucking ashamed of yourself.
Not gonna lie, I don’t know how to respond when it’s obvious you didn’t actually read my comment.
Like it’s a novel? 🙄 I read every one of your comments in this thread.
Frankly. I think you remaining speechless is for the best if you’re clicked this thread and decide that those literally in the process of committing violent acts are the ones who need to be shielded. “Kicking them out of the bar” isn’t a solution in the slightest and the more you double down the more I see just another Nazi sitting at their table.
More that you’re either not bothering to read or arguing against a straw man.
Whatever you got to tell yourself so you can justify ignoring critism. Not surprising, still disappointing.
Me: “I’m not saying tolerate them, I’m saying dehumanization of any human isn’t acceptable.”
You: “Why are you Defending Nazis?”
Your responses are so far removed from what I was saying that I can’t even take it as criticism, you’ve assigned me a position I didn’t take, and are trying to take me to task over it.
Good job man, you won the argument you’re having with yourself. Kudos.
The first sentence qualifier doesn’t make the second sentence any less of a defense. The fact that you can’t see that is historical ignorance.
An eye for an eye.
Anyway, I tried to make it clear that the problem I have is the dehumanization. And at no point did I afford them anything I wouldn’t afford literally any human.
If you take offense with me saying that humans deserve to be treated as humans, I think that says more about you than me but I admit my opinion on that is more than a little biased.
That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be dealt with in other ways. Kick them out of stores, refuse to let them take part in society, police their actions (or attempted actions.)
There are many ways to deal with them without dehumanization.
None that slow them down, much less stop them. They are flying swasitkas and self identifying as nazis. They clearly don’t care if they are part of “polite society”. Was the Third Reich defeated with shame? You’re playing with monopoly money here.
Out of sight out of mind. Forcing them out of the store only means they abuse victims down the street. It’s not a solution.
Nazis don’t need an eye based provocation, their entire philosophy is based around blinding others. There is no offramp for the violence they execute since their hate and propaganda will always fuel another attack. They went to a pride parade because the mere existcane of minorities is seen as legitimate threat to the. There is no appealing to the humanity of those who gleefully call and execute violence indiscriminately.
Advocating for the humanity of Nazis is to deny the humanity of their victims.