• MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    So, googling it, the general premise is you should use smart pointers instead to avoid crashes. Got it.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      They all have footguns that cause different crashes.

      If you want to do explicit memory access without inevitable safety problems, you need Rust. That’s the whole hype with Rust.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Unlike many other programming languages, which are often picked up on the go from tutorials found on the Internet, few are able to quickly pick up C++ without studying a well-written C++ book. It is way too big and complex for doing this. In fact, it is so big and complex, that there are very many very bad C++ books out there. And we are not talking about bad style, but things like sporting glaringly obvious factual errors and promoting abysmally bad programming styles.

        https://stackoverflow.com/questions/388242/the-definitive-c-book-guide-and-list

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Considering that most of the “answers” I’ve found on StackOverflow were complete dogshit, I’m wary of this reading list