• YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Some states (California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington) have two-party consent laws, making it illegal to record a conversation without consent from all parties in the recording. At the very least, a recording w/o consent would be inadmissible in court, but it could also land you in prison (up to 5 years in Maryland and Massachusetts).

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 hours ago

      What if you simply announce that you are recording and remind them they have the option to hang up if they don’t like it

      • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That’s the legal method to go about it, yes. So long as you make clear indication first that you’re recording, its all on the other end to make the choice to continue.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They have had cases of people recording the police that dropped the evidence after the police lied about that interaction to convict them, and the people catching the police in a lie by recording get charged with that felony charge.

      • YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Recording police is different and usually considered protected by the first amendment as long as it is an on-duty officer and you are lawfully present in a public space.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s protected until it isn’t. There are a great many examples of this happening. All quite rage inducing I can assure you, and going back decades.