Did anyone bother to read the article? It’s a fairly well reasoned takedown of neoliberalism with suggestion of a replacement system based on the humanistic needs of the system, treating workers as the point rather than an expense to be minimized. Yes it comes from a position of “wow isn’t this surprising” but positions it as contrast with the traditional neoliberal expectations, showing repeatedly how the opposite is true.
Did anyone bother to read the article? It’s a fairly well reasoned takedown of neoliberalism with suggestion of a replacement system based on the humanistic needs of the system, treating workers as the point rather than an expense to be minimized. Yes it comes from a position of “wow isn’t this surprising” but positions it as contrast with the traditional neoliberal expectations, showing repeatedly how the opposite is true.