• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Sort of. Marx had the same concept of authority and dictatorship, in that they belong to classes, and therefore should belong to the working classes. The anarchist critique of authority presented by Anark doesn’t make it seem bad at all.

    • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 minutes ago

      The issue with using language such as “dictatorship” and “authoritarian” is those words have specific negative colloquial connotations.

      For example, one of the dictionary (Merriam-Webster) definitions of “authoritarian” is:

      of, relating to, or favoring a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people

      This definition specifies a singular “leader or an elite” and would be incompatible with a definition that includes rule by the proletariat.

      Similarly, here is one of Merriam-Webster’s definitions for “dictatorship”:

      a form of government in which absolute power is concentrated in a dictator or a small clique

      My point being not that these definitions are absolute and cannot be changed, but currently in western societies, that the definitions describe rule by a singular elite leader or small group of leaders who have absolute, or near absolute power over their populace.