lemmy.onlylans.io
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
inari@piefed.zip to Space@beehaw.orgEnglish ·
edit-2
20 hours ago

Voyager 1 is still transmitting from beyond the heliosphere on 22 watts — less power than the bulb in your hallway — and the engineers who built it in the 1970s never expected we'd still be listening

spacedaily.com

external-link
message-square
27
fedilink
87
external-link

Voyager 1 is still transmitting from beyond the heliosphere on 22 watts — less power than the bulb in your hallway — and the engineers who built it in the 1970s never expected we'd still be listening

spacedaily.com

inari@piefed.zip to Space@beehaw.orgEnglish ·
edit-2
20 hours ago
message-square
27
fedilink
Voyager 1 is still transmitting from beyond the heliosphere on 22 watts — less power than the bulb in your hallway — and the engineers who built it in the 1970s never expected we'd still be listening half a century later.
spacedaily.com
external-link
On 17 April 2026, mission engineers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California sent commands to switch off the Low-energy Charged Particles experiment aboard Voyager 1. The instrument had been operating, almost without interruption, since the spacecraft left Cape Canaveral in September 1977. The shutdown was not a fault. It was the latest in a […]
  • inari@piefed.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    NASA has a neat little video showing the path taken by Voyager 1: https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4139

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Very interesting. So they both manouvred (slingshot) using planets’ gravity wells? Not everything in SciFi is fiction I guess.

      And V1 has traveled further from our solar system than the solar system’s diameter. Wow.

      Extremely high bitrate on the video due to starry background, btw. My old lappy got wheezy.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes, and there was a 175 year window for the planets to be lined up like that.

        • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          You mean the planets just sat there for 175 years? Wow, I really learned something new today.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Windows to use all the gas giants for gravity slingshots in quick succession only occur every 175 years. Is that better?

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yes

      • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        In the scientific fiction genre, everything is scientifically possible. That’s the entire premise. Time tells us what they get right and what becomes fantasy.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Nothing in Star Wars is scientifically possible or ever will be.

          • RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Star wars is barely science fiction. It’s basically fantasy with a bit of tech.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              It’s absolutely fantasy. No debate. So is Star Trek.

              Actual science fiction is like the recent Hail Mary. Everything is based on liter real science, with maybe one “what if” kind of stretch.

        • Steve@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Wut

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Not everything, no.
          That’s called fantasy.

        • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          deleted by creator

Space@beehaw.org

space@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 168 users / day
  • 174 users / week
  • 219 users / month
  • 1.05K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 9.2K subscribers
  • 781 Posts
  • 1.93K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
  • wintrparkgrl@beehaw.org
  • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org