• Keilik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t think many people on here are into classic cars much, but if they allow more ethanol in gas that’s going to fuck up a pretty large amount of classic cars. Modern fuel lines are plastic to deal with the ethanol and impact resistance. before that we used rubber, and the current widely used (cheap) replacement fuel hose tolerates ethanol at the levels we had well enough for a few years.

    So there’s a decent chance this would burn down a bunch of cars (and boats) when the fuel lines dissolve from the ethanol and start spilling gas.

      • Zulu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Oh lord. Are 2000s cars classic cars now? Someone take me out back and shoot me.

        • Bad_Engineering@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Good news, you’re not fucked. Your car has been running on roughly 10-15% ethanol its entire life. If you havnt had problems yet, you likely won’t. Unless they go full stupid and put an absurd amount in of ethanol in, then it won’t effect most cars on the road today.

    • Bad_Engineering@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The main problem with ethanol in rubber fuel lines is that ethanol causes hardening and flaking of the rubber. Long before it ever gets bad enough to leak the little flakes of hardened rubber detatch from the inside of the line and travel down to fuel pumps, injectors, and carburators. Where they clog up all the small metered orifices that regulate the amount of fuel the engine is getting. This can lead to the car just not running or running poorly, to the internal components of the engine breaking or seizing, thus trashing the whole engine.

    • INeedANewUserName@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I thought most of those boats sunk/vehicles burned from the first round of ethanol addition? Any fiberglass fuel tank went to the bottom eventually as I understand it.

    • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      If you’re driving a classic car in the middle of a gas crisis, you kinda deserve it, imo. Those things are about the only thing more inefficient than a jacked up pavement princess.

      Edit: learned that “classic” has a much broader definition than I thought. Oops.

      • Medic8me@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I drive a car thati bought used over a decade ago. It’s cost effective, paid for and not a gas guzzler. Fuck me though cause I own an old car. One with rubber gas lines.

        • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Did I say “fuck people with slightly older cars”?

          I was specifically responding to op complaining about affecting classic cars. It sucks that your slightly older car might be affected by this, but don’t jump into the shade and pretend I threw it at you.

          • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            “Classic car” isn’t just some vibe. It’s literally a legal term for cars of a certain age. Depending on the country it refers to >15, >20 or >25 years old cars. That means you can have a relatively fuel efficient car that is considered a classic car.

            The first Toyota Prius came out 1997 (29 years ago) and would be considered a classic car today.

      • Keilik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m actually driving my 1971 MGB around these days because I get 55MPG since it has 75ish horsepower and weighs about 2000lbs total lol