The US Senate on Wednesday once again voted down a resolution that would have restricted President Donald Trump’s ability to use military force against Iran, and this time a Democratic senator was the deciding vote.

The resolution failed after Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) voted with the majority of Republican senators against a war powers resolution introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.).

The resolution would would have passed had Fetterman supported it because Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) all voted in favor.

This is now the seventh time the Senate has blocked a war powers resolution on Iran since Trump illegally began the conflict in late February…

    • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Manchin at least was a ‘D’ seat a fraction of the time, but instead it’s a regular ‘R’ seat now; imo it was a trade down. With Fetterman it’s just a complete waste since we could have an actual Democrat in that seat. I feel it’s more like a Sinema situation.

    • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      IMO literally took his place.

      My theory is that the DNC and the Dem establishment, in order to ensure that they can mouth leftist platitudes without the risk of actually advancing leftist interests and thereby alienating their big money donors, always have at least one or two ringers - people who, for one reason or another (most likely because they’re bribeable and bribed or extortable and extorted) can be counted on to, when necessary, cast the vote(s) that ensure that the Republicans don’t quite lose.

      So Fetterman, just like Manchin (and Sinema) before him, is doing exactly what he’s supposed to do.

      • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I used to believe that but what is the point anymore? They have the literal keys to the kingdom and speed running fascism. Why pretend anymore?

        • YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because the American people are a violent bunch, so they have to somewhat pretend otherwise face that violence. If the democratic base used that violence against the democratic leadership I’m sure the republicans would be cheering and suddenly you have both sides rooting for violence against government officials, which can quickly spiral out of control.