• Personally I don’t see why the views of those that write software should really concern us, as long as the technical implementation is not biased. It’s open-source and people can take it and do with it what they please. No-one is forcing you to accept certain views or think about things critically (including assessing others viewpoints that may be different to yours). I feel like it’s a bit of a waste of time to worry about these things.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      biases manifest in really strange and unexpected ways and you’ll fail even when you try to intentionally account for them; that’s why things like facial recognition success rate correlates to the darkness of your skin or why successful ai recognition of text/speech is related how different your language is to english or mandarin.

      the only way to successfully gaurd against bias in software development is to have developer teams comprised of people can naturally keep each other’s biases in check.

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      as long as the technical implementation is not biased.

      Piefed has been baking in biases though, like adding a bunch of leftist/international sources in a huge blocklist labelled ‘qanon’, which if you then want to disable it’s got to be done manually.

      Not to mention clear disregard for breaking activitypub interoperability.