It doesn’t solve the underlying problem of wealth disparity. You can keep chopping day after day, year after year, but the inevitable solution is going to be: take the wealth and redistribute it. AKA Taxes.
Plenty of places have little or no government and no billionaires even with States actively trying to fight the idea. Government is only one way of organizing and not a very good or egalitarian one
If Wikipedia were the sole organization operating within a territory and they decided what people were allowed to do in that territory, then yes they’d abso-fucking-lutely be the government.
Meh, tax em anyways.
I’m not in favor of taxing the rich give them free baskets instead
It doesn’t solve the underlying problem of wealth disparity. You can keep chopping day after day, year after year, but the inevitable solution is going to be: take the wealth and redistribute it. AKA Taxes.
They do seem to be proposing an aggressive Estate Tax campaign.
If you give them all free baskets for their heads long enough you will be fine taxes require a government those don’t seem to be doing good at this
Not having a government leads directly into a violent government
Many countries do this task quite well.
Plenty of places have little or no government and no billionaires even with States actively trying to fight the idea. Government is only one way of organizing and not a very good or egalitarian one
If you “organize” a nation full of people to decide on the “rules”, then that is “government” writing the “laws”.
So the IEEE and web consortium unicode and Wikipedia foundation are governments.
If Wikipedia were the sole organization operating within a territory and they decided what people were allowed to do in that territory, then yes they’d abso-fucking-lutely be the government.