“Sure.” is a cop-out. It’s either a “yes”, a “no”, or at least discussion of what is succeeding versus where progress that has potential to occur is being over-cautiously avoided or ignored.
Eh, fair enough. Play with your food long enough and it’ll go bad or get stolen out from under you though. You’ve got an opportunity to undermine American imperialism and reshape the nature of the global economy. But if your attitude is a casual “we’ll get there whenever, someday, whatever”, you’re just creating space for America to course correct and rebound or for someone with resolve to provide the new direction.
Indeed it is. Since you don’t provide any specifics then all I can do is probe the limits of what you mean by “casual” and see if I can come to a clearer conclusion based off your responses. Or you could just explain what “casual” means to you.
Sure.
“Sure.” is a cop-out. It’s either a “yes”, a “no”, or at least discussion of what is succeeding versus where progress that has potential to occur is being over-cautiously avoided or ignored.
“Sure” means “yes,” but casually.
Eh, fair enough. Play with your food long enough and it’ll go bad or get stolen out from under you though. You’ve got an opportunity to undermine American imperialism and reshape the nature of the global economy. But if your attitude is a casual “we’ll get there whenever, someday, whatever”, you’re just creating space for America to course correct and rebound or for someone with resolve to provide the new direction.
That’s not my attitude, though, that’s your perception of my attitude.
Indeed it is. Since you don’t provide any specifics then all I can do is probe the limits of what you mean by “casual” and see if I can come to a clearer conclusion based off your responses. Or you could just explain what “casual” means to you.
I mean I was responding to you in particular casually, not that China is taking a casual approach.