• SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Putting aside age and term limits aside, I think adding more checks and balances to SCOTUS appointees would be important. The current process puts the appointment of justices into too few hands.

    In a revised USA, I think the nation should be divided into regions with their own judiciaries and executive offices, but each region sends justices to represent them on the national supreme court. If the US was in four pieces, and each could contribute four justices apiece, that would be 16. Toss in the president of each region picking a justice to represent their administration, and that is 20 justices. The four presidents of the regions also pick a figurehead president to represent the nation, who in turn chooses a head justice to assist the supreme court proceedings and to be a tie breaker when the other 20 justices can’t agree.

    By dividing up representation like this, it would be harder for the supreme court to become corrupt and stratified.

    EDIT: A thought. The justices that a region assigns, 2 of them could be picked by the region’s congress, 2 by their judiciary. This might further reduce the odds of corruption.