• WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        LLM’s are not a source, and i never claimed it was.

        just like wikipedia is not a source

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You just put the LLM output there, if you mean Alan Donald is your source then he’s a liar as I already showed.

        • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          ‘source’ as in the source of the comment (in this case yeah the LLM did not provide sources)

          wikipedia does provide sources

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      that statement is in quotes because it is LLM. which is why i had to specify that i have read it and it tracks with my position on the matter.

      if the information is deficient then because i have used it to stake my portion then others can take that up with me because it is the position i hold.