Kash Patel’s $250M lawsuit could haunt him for months
www.independent.co.uk
Kash Patel has filed a lawsuit over a profile piece. But, by suing, the FBI director only brings more light to allegations about his behaviors and risks future embarrassment, Bruce Golding reports

Kash Patel has filed a lawsuit over a profile piece. But, by suing, the FBI director only brings more light to allegations about his behaviors and risks future embarrassment

FBI Director Kash Patel’s $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic did little to dampen the disturbing allegations in what he calls its “hit piece” against him — and instead sparked a firestorm of broadsides from his critics.

Patel’s federal court filing - which included a plethora of typos - summarized the report’s nearly 2,200 words of somewhat dense prose into a concise list of 17 easy-to-read sentences about the damning information provided by more than two dozen anonymous sources, some of them current and former FBI officials or staffers at law-enforcement and intelligence agencies.

The allegations cited include that Patel “is known to drink to the point of obvious intoxication, in many cases at the private club Ned’s in Washington, D.C., while in the presence of White House and other administration staff,” that he’s “also known to drink to excess at the Poodle Room in Las Vegas, where he frequently spends parts of his weekends” and that “members of his security detail had difficulty waking Patel because he was seemingly intoxicated” multiple times over the past year.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    3·
    10 hours ago

    Newsweek also made a point of finding a series of spelling errors in the filing: “feable” instead of “feeble,” “politices” instead of “policies” and “dicussed” instead of “discussed.”

    “The presence of simple typos in the complaint does not undermine its legal claims, but it does stand out in a filing that centers on alleged journalistic negligence,” the magazine said. “Court filings are typically reviewed by multiple attorneys before submission, making such errors notable — particularly in a high‑profile case involving the director of the FBI and one of the country’s most-prominent magazines.”