Almost from the moment Trump entered the House chamber Tuesday night to deliver his State of the Union address, Democrats began to disrupt. It only deteriorated from there.

Why it matters: It’s the new normal for presidential speeches to Congress, with Republicans heckling Democratic presidents and vice versa.

Tuesday’s disruptions came despite House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) repeatedly telling his members behind closed doors not to repeat the widespread disruptions that Trump faced last year during his speech to a joint session of Congress. Ahead of Tuesday’s speech, Jeffries sternly dismissed Axios’ reporting that protests were still likely to occur despite his instructions to the contrary. A Jeffries spokesperson did not immediately respond on Tuesday night to a request for comment. What happened: As Trump entered the chamber, Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who was notoriously escorted out of Trump’s address last year for repeated heckling, mounted yet another protest.

Green held up a sign reading “BLACK PEOPLE AREN’T APES” — a reference to a racist video Trump’s account posted this month. Green refused to sit as Trump began his speech. Several Republicans verbally confronted Green, with a few trying to wrench the sign out of Green’s hands. Eventually, Green was escorted out of the chamber by a House sergeant-at-arms staffer. Zoom in: The broader heckling began in earnest shortly after Trump goaded Democrats by pointing out they didn’t applaud a line about banning gender transition surgery for minors.

“Look, nobody stands up. These people are crazy. I’m telling you, they’re crazy,” Trump said. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) began to heckle, yelling “lies!” and — when Trump began to discuss immigration — “you’re killing Americans.” Tlaib and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who were sitting next to each other, repeatedly heckled Trump, shouting over lines about immigration, crime and foreign policy. Between the lines: At one point in the speech, Tlaib yelled at Trump, “How are those Epstein files? How are those Epstein files? Release them! … Release the Epstein files!”

  • Zahtu@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “if they go low, we go high” only helps so much as if the public and the other side is concerned about their reputation. so democrat leadership telling fellow democrats to maintan the high ground is so much of an outdated concept in today’s landscape that you could even call that unrealistic and spineless. One has to fight for their voices to be heard. It was the same in the weimar republic before nazi germany. Where the communist party KPD helped Adolf get elected as chancellor. Not so much surprising, shortly thereafter they were all imprisoned. Let the american democrats hear that lesson from history.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I say we reinstate duels.

      Everybody who has a grievance with Trump could just take it up on the dueling ground.

      And he’s not allowed to stop until everyone gets their shot.

      No champions (unless they are in the order of presidential succession). Flintlock only.

      • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh, I can see it now.

        • Upon the passing of the new Dueling Act, Trump immediately demands a duel with Obama to prove that he’s the better president.
        • After some threats and such, Obama reluctantly agrees to the duel, since he figures he won’t be around much longer anyway.
        • Trump decides to stack the deck in his favor by posting some Secret Service snipers just outside of the duel. They have orders to shoot Obama just before the duel begins.
        • Instead of doing as ordered, one of the snipers shoot Trump instead.
    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Learn from history??? The Americans??? Oooooh, I have some bad news for you. Most Americans can’t read.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            They can analyze and identify the author’s purpose. Just that analysis is usually superficial. Like reading 1984 they’d be “BIG GOVERNMENT BAD!” where as you and I would take away that an authoritarian government will always turn into a surveillance state that maintains external conflict to ignore internal realities within. As well maintaining a strict social structure with downwards mobility but very little upwards.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              In the defense of at least myself, I’m too much of a scatterbrained autist to properly articulate such an idea most of the time even if I have wholly absorbed and applied an idea into action. Other times I’m fucking braindead and don’t know how to take the chain off of a chainsaw because the useless fucking manual just says to do it like I’m supposed to fucken know.