• I_Jedi@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You would be right if voters have an unbiased objective view when voting. However, Newsom’s rich backers can get the press to talk up Newsom while making hit pieces on his opponents. Like, if Newsom won South Carolina by only a few percentage points, the NYT could write a piece with the headline “Newsom slams primary opponents by winning South Carolina in a landslide. Buttigieg expected to drop out”.

    And don’t forget all the paid infiltrators on social media looking to tip the scales in Newsom’s favor. Reddit will be filled with articles about why Newsom is the one and only viable candidate in the Democrat primary. Facebook will get a ton of Newsom advertising. Dating apps will have bots profiles that say Newsom is the bot’s favored candidate.

    And only a handful of people bother to track down primary sources themselves. They will absolutely fall for the social engineering and support Newsom in droves.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Again: If they could have done that to win the primary, they would have stuck with Harris and done it. Or if they were secret Biden stans the whole time they would have managed Iowa and New Hampshire to not be such a failure for their chosen one. They’re reacting and tweaking, and they have more effective and more efficient options.