• pedz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        It’s Barbara Streisand’s.

        The term was coined in 2005 by Mike Masnick of Techdirt after Barbra Streisand attempted to suppress the publication of a photograph by Kenneth Adelman showing her clifftop residence in Malibu, taken to document coastal erosion in California.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Shy of those houses being there, what’s so bad about the sea reshaping the shoreline? Hasn’t that been going on for quite some time already, like, a few hundred million years or so?

          • pedz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            It’s a natural phenomenon but AFAIK it can be accentuated or accelerated by the rise of the sea level, or the passage of boats and vessels. It can be entirely normal, but it can also be provoked or worsened by other factors. And that’s why we document and do some research about it?!

            I’m not a climate scientist but luckily the Wikipedia’s article on the Streisand effect has a link to coastal erosion if you want to know more.

            • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              35 minutes ago

              That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem.