• pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    It’s Barbara Streisand’s.

    The term was coined in 2005 by Mike Masnick of Techdirt after Barbra Streisand attempted to suppress the publication of a photograph by Kenneth Adelman showing her clifftop residence in Malibu, taken to document coastal erosion in California.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      Shy of those houses being there, what’s so bad about the sea reshaping the shoreline? Hasn’t that been going on for quite some time already, like, a few hundred million years or so?

      • pedz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        It’s a natural phenomenon but AFAIK it can be accentuated or accelerated by the rise of the sea level, or the passage of boats and vessels. It can be entirely normal, but it can also be provoked or worsened by other factors. And that’s why we document and do some research about it?!

        I’m not a climate scientist but luckily the Wikipedia’s article on the Streisand effect has a link to coastal erosion if you want to know more.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem.