You say every one, someone else says there are exceptions, you say obviously but this is true for most of them, they say yeah that’s fair, and nothing of substance is added to the discussion. Why not skip that whole rigamarole and just start with “the vast majority” or “nearly every one” instead of unnecessarily hyperbolizing?
See, there you go! Now I can’t point out the one guy that demonstrates an exception if you stated “every person” instead of most! I get that it’s an annoying thing to change, but is it more annoying than having this conversation multiple times?
You should realize that most people don’t find the concept of a discussion annoying or challenging, but i expect that probably is not the case for conversations that include you.
I find it annoying when a large portion of law enforcement would likely help the federal government interfere with elections and people start nitpicking over exactly how many. If I can offer a simple solution to prevent getting sidetracked like that in the future, I will.
I guess you haven’t yet realized that every single law enforcement officer in America is on the same team as these guys.
They don’t have enough of them either. They are like a fraction of a percent of the overall population. They ain’t gonna stop us.
We’ll see. They have been pulling this fascist bullshit for a century and no one has stopped them yet.
No, this bullshit is pretty different from business as usual. It’s quite important that everyone understands that.
Want a list of people that have been killed by the border patrol that you didn’t give a shit about?
Yes go ahead and list every one of them. I’ll print it out and mail it to the Give A Shit headquarters posthaste.
I know a police chief who hates Trump with a burning passion. Stop thinking they are all like Arpaio.
Want about a million counter examples?
You say every one, someone else says there are exceptions, you say obviously but this is true for most of them, they say yeah that’s fair, and nothing of substance is added to the discussion. Why not skip that whole rigamarole and just start with “the vast majority” or “nearly every one” instead of unnecessarily hyperbolizing?
Most people have brains that can process obvious hyperbole without falling all over themselves.
See, there you go! Now I can’t point out the one guy that demonstrates an exception if you stated “every person” instead of most! I get that it’s an annoying thing to change, but is it more annoying than having this conversation multiple times?
You should realize that most people don’t find the concept of a discussion annoying or challenging, but i expect that probably is not the case for conversations that include you.
I find it annoying when a large portion of law enforcement would likely help the federal government interfere with elections and people start nitpicking over exactly how many. If I can offer a simple solution to prevent getting sidetracked like that in the future, I will.