• Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Maybe a single person shouldn’t have enough wealth to rival a country? It’s almost like that gives them more power than the government that is supposed to keep them in check.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I work for a small city that’s an enclave for the super-rich. Literally every household is multi-millionaires (I don’t live there, of course).

      When we butt heads with a resident, it’s a challenge because most of our residents have a larger budget and pool of resources than the city. My favorite example was when a resident tried to build a retaining wall in a drainage easement for a new home that would result in a street behind them flooding any time it rained. When we told them no, they tried to buy the Engineering firm we hired to review their development.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I also can’t think of a more insane pick than to let that individual be Elon Musk. Really shows how billionaires fail their way to the top.

        At the end of the day I think billionaires owning space companies undermines the pursuit of humans going into space and studying space in general as it is difficult enough to justify to the average person normally that space exploration is important but when you have the people leading the pursuit of it hoarding enough wealth to lift an astounding amount of people out of poverty, then the association of those people with space exploration threatens to make space exploration a target of populist austerity sentiment unfairly because by its very nature it is a loud thing that draws lots of attention.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          18 hours ago

          There aren’t any good billionaires. They get rich leeching off everyone else’s work, suppressing wages and compensation, and avoiding taxes on their insane wealth. On top of that, a seemingly normal person is likely to become a complete PoS when they no longer have to face any consequences for being a PoS because of their wealth.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            The way I see it, billionaires are best understood as an autonomous cancerous process of money hoarding money, the human being who is the billionaire at the center of it hardly has any agency, just raw and pure complicity in the growth of the cancer enveloping them in a replacement of their human identity with an approximation of one constructed from financial abstractions.

            Billionaires think they are making more and more important choices as they get richer but what really is occurring is they are becoming less and less a relevant part of the money they hoard in terms of what actions that entity of money takes and why it does so.

            To be a proud billionaire is to be a proud insect host for the paratisoid wasp that is wealth hoarding. It is a strange and disturbing ideology from the perspective of an insect to take pride in being the vessel for a process that will most certainly annihilate you from within.

          • ngdev@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            not saying shes a good one and i am not a fan, but i dont think taylor swift did that did she?