David Fitzgerald knows how tough it is to prevent gun violence. In 15 years working in some of Baltimore’s deadliest neighborhoods for a program called Safe Streets, he said, he’s defused hundreds of fights that could have led to a shooting.

The effort, part of Baltimore’s more than $100 million gun violence prevention plan, relies on staffers like Fitzgerald to build trust with people at risk of such violence and offer them resources like housing or food. Researchers believe these programs reduce gun deaths.

Yet one morning in 2019, Fitzgerald said, his oldest son, Deshawn McCoy, then 26, was shot just outside of the neighborhood he patrolled at the time. Fitzgerald said McCoy was a “really beautiful soul,” who fixed dirt bikes at a local garage. McCoy became the city’s 65th homicide victim in 2019, one of 348 that year, among the city’s deadliest. He left behind three daughters.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t prove blacks are violent thugs unless you remove the programs, manipulate the data, and encourage positions of stress and poverty so that you can force the outcome you want.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Many of the US Government’s actions make little sense unless they’re coming from the Nazi position that many kinds of people don’t deserve to live, so the government should do everything it can to make them die.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The framing is weird here starting with “gun deaths” in the headline and using the word “gun” 31 more times in the article. The Safe Streets program has little to do with guns per se; it’s a conflict resolution and community mediation program. One of the outcomes of resolving conflicts is that fewer people shoot each other, but this article feels like the author got paid extra every time they used the word “gun”.