• antihumanitarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t take this as a defense of him, but rather a statement that there are better, more credible arguments to push. From what I can gather the entirety of the evidence “linking” is a phone call making the claim. It’s not even clear the baby was real at all. If it’s true, this isn’t evidence enough, and is effectively a red herring and a self made straw man. Don’t take the bait, use better arguments.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      While I agree, I kinda feel like this is a good teaser.

      We’ve known everything in the Epstein files for years. We need to make people actually look at them, because they’re shockingly graphic

    • dermanus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That was my thought too. There’s plenty of stuff we can prove, let’s focus on that. This one is egregious but it’s better to point to the ones with more evidence, we have plenty of those to choose from.