🏴حمید پیام عباسی🏴@crazypeople.online to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoVictims of Communismlemmy.mlimagemessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1472arrow-down190
arrow-up1382arrow-down1imageVictims of Communismlemmy.ml 🏴حمید پیام عباسی🏴@crazypeople.online to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square149fedilink
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 hours agoNo. Bukharin was both a Mechanist and a right-opportunist that rejected collectivization, and ultimately stood against the USSR. I think it’s better for you to confront the ghost of Stalin than focus on what the USSR may have been had someone else been elected.
minus-squareDylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agomaybe Grigory Zinoviev, perhaps?
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 hours agoWhy the alt-history focus?
minus-squareDylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoi’m just asking what would the ussr would be like if someone other than stalin (or trotsky) led the country after lenin (like zinoviev)
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoI think a better basis is instead looking at why the soviets did what they did in the first place before asking what might have been different otherwise.
No. Bukharin was both a Mechanist and a right-opportunist that rejected collectivization, and ultimately stood against the USSR.
I think it’s better for you to confront the ghost of Stalin than focus on what the USSR may have been had someone else been elected.
maybe Grigory Zinoviev, perhaps?
Why the alt-history focus?
i’m just asking what would the ussr would be like if someone other than stalin (or trotsky) led the country after lenin (like zinoviev)
I think a better basis is instead looking at why the soviets did what they did in the first place before asking what might have been different otherwise.