just_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agoIt’s time to accept that the US supreme court is illegitimate and must be replaced | Ryan Doerfler and Samuel Moynwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1605arrow-down113
arrow-up1592arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to accept that the US supreme court is illegitimate and must be replaced | Ryan Doerfler and Samuel Moynwww.theguardian.comjust_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square79fedilink
minus-squareduncan_bayne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours ago That was a power that the court effectively granted to itself in Marbury v. Madison, in 1803. Jesus that does go back a while. … reads … Huh. I always sort of assumed, as a non-American, that that was the one of the main purposes of the Supreme Court. It does seem like a good idea, though, to have some court responsible for deciding the Constitutionality of laws.
Jesus that does go back a while.
… reads …
Huh. I always sort of assumed, as a non-American, that that was the one of the main purposes of the Supreme Court.
It does seem like a good idea, though, to have some court responsible for deciding the Constitutionality of laws.