I think there is a bit of cultural narcissism underpinning it all. It’s the mindset that they are the special ones chosen for preferred treatment by the omnipotent ruler of the universe. No matter the issue, we’re the good ones and the other guy is bad, and leopards won’t eat our faces. It’s only when the cruel grifters they’ve voted into power casually do something that directly harms them do they begin to wonder if something might be wrong, but they assume it must be some oversight or unintentional error. “My exalted master, President Trump. You’ve deported my wife and sent my children to a Nicaraguan gulag, and I’m thinking that there must be some sort of error. We’ve followed all the rules, and hate everyone you hate. Surely we’re ‘the good ones,’ right? Right!?!”
There are lots of modern examples of “Jews for Hitler”, that’s for sure.
If things get bad enough, I’m sure even the very monied class but that are one the “wrong” side of some kind of sorting - including people like Thiel - will find themselves on the other end of that gun and they will be the most Pikachu-faced if it happens. Again, they apparently learned nothing from history. I’m sure the well-heeled Jews under Hitler thought their money would protect them, too.
Thiel is gay and I’m more than sure that a mobbed-up government that is pointed at him would be more than happy to seize all his assets, redistribute to the “worthy” people, and throw him in prison. Doesn’t matter if he identifies as a billionaire and has weird xtian beliefs that match with “maga” (whatever the fuck that term means - it’s just baby-talk, and I have a feeling that just like fascism, it doesn’t really have much of an ideology for a reason. It means whatever the current cult leaders says it means).
The analogy I’ve always heard is “living inside the fence” versus “outside the fence”. And how your perceived position shapes how you behave politically.
But I also see this painfully naive assumption that Democrats are actually for looser immigration policy or that a democratic administration won’t end in your wife/kids getting the old heave hoe.
In the end, it’s just two Have Nots arguing which plutocrat would trickle down on them better. There’s no reason to vote for Trump, but no reason to vote against him either. Doubley so when you realize your vote isn’t even impacting the election’s outcome.
If every Republican had a crystal ball and could know with perfect certainty whether their immediate family would suffer from Trump’s immigration policy… he would still be president today. The margins were too wide and the deck was too stacked.
I think there is a bit of cultural narcissism underpinning it all. It’s the mindset that they are the special ones chosen for preferred treatment by the omnipotent ruler of the universe. No matter the issue, we’re the good ones and the other guy is bad, and leopards won’t eat our faces. It’s only when the cruel grifters they’ve voted into power casually do something that directly harms them do they begin to wonder if something might be wrong, but they assume it must be some oversight or unintentional error. “My exalted master, President Trump. You’ve deported my wife and sent my children to a Nicaraguan gulag, and I’m thinking that there must be some sort of error. We’ve followed all the rules, and hate everyone you hate. Surely we’re ‘the good ones,’ right? Right!?!”
There are lots of modern examples of “Jews for Hitler”, that’s for sure.
If things get bad enough, I’m sure even the very monied class but that are one the “wrong” side of some kind of sorting - including people like Thiel - will find themselves on the other end of that gun and they will be the most Pikachu-faced if it happens. Again, they apparently learned nothing from history. I’m sure the well-heeled Jews under Hitler thought their money would protect them, too.
Thiel is gay and I’m more than sure that a mobbed-up government that is pointed at him would be more than happy to seize all his assets, redistribute to the “worthy” people, and throw him in prison. Doesn’t matter if he identifies as a billionaire and has weird xtian beliefs that match with “maga” (whatever the fuck that term means - it’s just baby-talk, and I have a feeling that just like fascism, it doesn’t really have much of an ideology for a reason. It means whatever the current cult leaders says it means).
The analogy I’ve always heard is “living inside the fence” versus “outside the fence”. And how your perceived position shapes how you behave politically.
But I also see this painfully naive assumption that Democrats are actually for looser immigration policy or that a democratic administration won’t end in your wife/kids getting the old heave hoe.
In the end, it’s just two Have Nots arguing which plutocrat would trickle down on them better. There’s no reason to vote for Trump, but no reason to vote against him either. Doubley so when you realize your vote isn’t even impacting the election’s outcome.
If every Republican had a crystal ball and could know with perfect certainty whether their immediate family would suffer from Trump’s immigration policy… he would still be president today. The margins were too wide and the deck was too stacked.