bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down148
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlbubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·19 hours agoIs it just the US saying not to trust the Chinese government?
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·12 hours agoThe US and our lackeys, yes
minus-squarebalance8873@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-29 hours agoBut don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agoIt would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agowhat are some of the other indicators?
Is it just the US saying not to trust the Chinese government?
The US and our lackeys, yes
Who are those lackeys?
But don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
It would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
what are some of the other indicators?