bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up164arrow-down153
arrow-up111arrow-down1imageLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlbubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·1 month agoThe US and our lackeys, yes
minus-squarebalance8873@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 month agoBut don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 month agoIt would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agowhat are some of the other indicators?
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoWho are those lackeys?
The US and our lackeys, yes
But don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
It would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
what are some of the other indicators?
US military bases
Who are those lackeys?