bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down153
arrow-up113arrow-down1imageLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlbubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·4 months agoThe US and our lackeys, yes
minus-squarebalance8873@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-24 months agoBut don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·4 months agoIt would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agowhat are some of the other indicators?
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 months agoWho are those lackeys?
The US and our lackeys, yes
But don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
It would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
what are some of the other indicators?
US military bases
Who are those lackeys?