• Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Actually I was walking right past what you were saying because I refuse to have this conversation. The actions depicted in every video I’ve seen of the incident do not constitute a threat to the officers or to property. The only reason this is being brought to a judge at all is because of politics.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes, there seemed to be a disconnect. I think what you’re saying is that the banging car windows is a pretense, and the real reason for the arrest is for exercising First Amendment rights.

            The reason given for the arrest is the banging and interference, and I thought you were saying those are protected.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I can say cops banged on my window or hood many times and never faced charges. Heck friends have just indicate to me to lower the window, open the door, or pay attention.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Right, but if you went to someone’s car while they were in it and banged on it even after they asked you to stop, that’s not going to be considered protected speech. Go bang on your own car window.