Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it’s “her decision to make,” she is a “very, very good politician.”

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been “out on the streets with her” and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. “It’s so incredibly genuine and open.”

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not sure she has the thunder she had in 2018. BUT If she calls for a general strike in the next 6 weeks, and then starts to be the lead organizer of said strike, she’s my gal. I really hope she learns from Bernie in specifically how he’s organized his national campaigns.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      2018 was different I don’t blame her for being more outspoken then. I agree with the other commentor that she should run for senate. She’ make an excellent senate majority leader. If there’s still no female president by 2036 she’d probably be a layup at that point.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t share the view that sexism is what is blocking a female president in the US; I think being an inauthentic corporate sellout is what has, so far, blocked a female president in the US. So that doesn’t factor in for me.

        2028, should there be an election, is 100% in play for AOC.

        And that actually is my biggest concern with AOC. Pelosi worked hard, from 2018-2020 to ice the FUCK out of AOC. And AOC stayed strong and outspoken. In fact, AOC in some ways was representing real leadership. When AOC ran again, won again, Pelosi instead of resisting, worked to bring her into the fold. And the strength of AOC’s rhetoric has diminished substantially. And AOC has become less and less outspoken and willing to target Democrats with criticism and become more and more of a “team player”. Now I’m not saying AOC is cooked, but she’s definitely on the stove.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I don’t share the view that sexism is what is blocking a female president in the US

          Me neither. 2036 is 3 elections away. Not exactly a long shot that the next 2 will be won by men. All I’m saying is that she’d probably be more effective in the senate (especially as leader) for the next decade and she’s young enough for a presidential run later.

          She’d be empowered as SML and given her aptitude that’s why I think she’d be a layup for first female president afterwards.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Seems like the core argument is that AOC should wait a few cycles.

            I question the strength of that argument given the nature of her approach to politics and our current/ ongoing political moment. She doesn’t get stronger as a candidate with time she gets weaker, more associated with the establishment.

            The outsider lane is the strongest right now and it’s hers to take in 2028. Neither Pritzker or Newsom can take that lane. Why wait?

            • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              The core of my argument is that the senate needs AOC more than the executive branch. America needs functional legislatures more than the ideal commander and chief. Americans have fixated on the presidency for generations at the expense of functional house/senate/courts.

              Why wait?

              Because the senate is the real bottleneck; as we saw during Obama/Biden. Meanwhile 2028’s presidential race is a referendum on democracy regardless of who the DNC puts forward.

              The core of your argument seems to place a higher priority on AOC winning the presidency than the actual outcomes. I’m arguing for what I see as best for USA, not AOC.

              Given her aptitude I think she could win in the senate and would be an excellent majority leader. AOC would also not be required to resign as senate majority leader to run for president. IMO she’s one of the few people that could effectively campaign while maintaining her senate duties.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                The higher priority is in winning the presidency, and regardless of what the constitution once said it was interpreted to mean, having an executive with the same political and ethical priorities as myself is of the highest priority. This is coupled with them being of the kind of person, like FDR, who be willing to assert the kind of executive authority established under Trumpism.

                It is now established in the US that both the Congress and the judiciary are secondary authorities to the executive branch.

                A meek, milquetoast Democrat, or a greasy centrist, or yet another billionaire, taking office and just trying to glaze over and return to a neo liberal business as usual would be disastrous for this country. We need bold reforms and it’s not going to come through the legislative when the scope of executive powers have been expanded as such There are plenty of adequate Democrats to fill this Senate seat, it’s not one that the DNC is at risk of losing. Democrats, however, have not been effective at winning the presidency.

                AOC being effective 20 years from now is of almost no value because timing is everything. Also, it’s clear to me that Bernie has been grooming her for a Presidential run now for several years. He’s handing off the reigns to the movement he built. AOC has been tossed around as a potential presidential candidate since her first upset. She the obvious progressive pick.

                Right now in the mix for 2028 the three names available to you are Newsom, Pritzker, and AOC. There are boomers and Jefferies and Buttegiegs of the world that might throw their names in, but they are way lower down the tier list.

                Your perspective seems to be based largely out of parochial thinking that you know best where AOCs skills and aptitudes should be deployed, and that the"true power" of the government lay in the Senate. I don’t think your opinions are with soit because you are ignoring the entirety of the context of the current political landscape and the entire redefinition of the structure of power which has happened under Trump. Thankfully though, like I’ll be doing, opinions like yours will be recognized as the anachronism that they are by the politically savvy, this be dutifully ignored.

                • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  Thankfully though, like I’ll be doing, opinions like yours will be recognized as the anachronism that they are by the politically savvy

                  lmao k

                  sorry for having a different opinion than you. jfc buddy wtf.

        • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I don’t share the view that sexism is what is blocking a female president in the US; I think being an inauthentic corporate sellout is what has, so far, blocked a female president in the US.

          I sort of agree, but there is definitely enough sexism to knock off a couple percentage points. It’s possible to win and AOC has the right populist appeal that might actually get her elected, but both her gender and her latine name will give her more work than a cishet white man.

          These aren’t barriers, but the are hurdles.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Our greatest recent win was with a black man with a Muslim name. Charisma and idealistic policy are way more important factors than all these excuses the centrists are throwing around now that the female nominee might not be a neoliberal. The same “but whatabout vagina” hand wringing surged when Warren was briefly leading the primary. And the same deferral to whatever prejudices are convenient to the end goal were brought out against Obama.

            The same people promoting moderate Republican sensitivities as our guiding light are the ones who keep running shitty candidates and losing. They don’t know how to win elections.

            • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              I agree. That’s why AOC should focus on policies instead of identity politics. Because what I said is also true

              Edit: I’m not saying she’s doing that, but dems have a history of trying and failing to fight cons on those terms

    • finitebanjo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Who else would you vote for? Or are you employing you won’t vote for the DNC in the general?

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Who else would you vote for in the midterms?

        Right now I’m still trying to find someone to primary this fucking cunt, Ed Case. I had a line on someone in the first, but they’re now moving to Portugal. I’ve put out feelers to Tyler Dos-santos, but like, I’m pretty sure Tyler thinks he’s going to be governor and isn’t willing to fight Case. I’ve reached out to some a kanaka lawyer only to find out that her family is close family friends with Case.

        Then there is this shit-bird: https://ballotpedia.org/Samantha_DeCorte

        I’m trying to figure out if Desire Desoto is running. She came close but fell short and we ended up with a MAGA rep. Kanaka maoli are very pro-Trump.

        Or are you employing you won’t vote for the DNC in the general?

        You interpreting anything I said through that lens means your brain is fucking broken and need to step back from politics. Fuck off with any even fucking hinting of blue-maga bullshit that handed Trump the election.

        • finitebanjo@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          I had a bit of a typo there, idk why midterms was on my mind.

          You interpreting anything I said through that lens means your brain is fucking broken

          There are just so damn many psyop bastards trying to convince leftists not to vote for the DNC that I have to be suspicious of everyone.