But not alcohol or anything else…I wonder what demographic he’s trying to target

  • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They have a buffer tube, otherwise they wouldn’t cycle, unless we are talking about something like the SIG MCX then the buffer system isn’t in the tube.

    They just don’t have the stock making it not intended to shoulder, the stock, not the buffer tube is what makes an SBR.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      yeah this isn’t universal. I’ve seen one setup that had no tube, assumed that was the silly ass attraction to the whole stupid fucking thing. had some kind of warty plug bit that was maybe 2" long where the buffer tube assembly would be, assumed it was a something along these lines:

      https://www.80-lower.com/80-lower-blog/how-to-build-a-bufferless-ar-instructions/

      If the bulk of them have tubes what’s the fucking point then? so you can have your ‘arm brace’ mounted to something?

      it’s all so fucking stupid

      • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s to make the gun not a rifle. Rifles have to have stocks, that’s it, that’s the point. If you want a short gun that shoots an intermediate cartridge it’s an AR which is really common and the ammo is cheap, or an AK which skips the buffer tube but ammo is more expensive. Or something like a cut down mosin nagant since they used to be really cheap so why not.