Paul@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1273arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1268arrow-down1external-linkWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comPaul@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square84fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up49arrow-down1·2 days agoFascist regimes eventually come for the guns
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·2 days agoFascist regimes always come for guns. Governments that come for guns are not always fascist A implies b, but b does not imply a.
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 day agoIs your assertion that this is not a fascist regime? Otherwise you simply repeated what I said in the first sentence.
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoNo, my assertion is that a government coming for your guns is not the reason it’s fascist
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoThat’s fine, I agree, but that’s not what I said
Fascist regimes eventually come for the guns
Fascist regimes always come for guns. Governments that come for guns are not always fascist
A implies b, but b does not imply a.
Is your assertion that this is not a fascist regime? Otherwise you simply repeated what I said in the first sentence.
No, my assertion is that a government coming for your guns is not the reason it’s fascist
That’s fine, I agree, but that’s not what I said