• They help individuals channel their frustration, isolation and desperation
  • They are a show of strength
  • They typically lead to more political involvement
  • They have already produced wins
  • They must remain nonviolent to be effective
  • They must be in small towns in the heartland, not just big coastal cities

Find one near you at nokings.org

This post uses a gift link, but some people do seem to be prompted to register. I can’t change SF Chronicle policy about that. They also have a history of sending lawyers after people who post archive.today links to their articles, so whatever you do, don’t plug the URL into that site.

  • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 个月前

    They don’t have to, but data shows over and over that non violent ones more often end to being more successful at regime change.

    Benefits for the non violent:

    • more people are willing to join protests
    • much harder to use force to squash protesters (they can still try, but that often motivates more people to join, that is what for example happened in Euromaidan)
    • it is much harder to frame that those protesters are there to hurt ordinary people
    • sends signal for good people in power to do the right thing and that we have their back
    • validates people that they aren’t alone and that it is a lot of us

    We actually have more power than them, they only succeed if we get scared and think there’s nothing we can do. It becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.