• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The fact is that this character played an role in normalizing this shift we saw, across the board, towards accepting this kind of right wing framing of politics. The fact that it was satire is irrelevant. The normalization is damage done.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      I upvoted you because you’re making an interesting argument, but I’m definitely more in the Charlie Chaplin camp on political satire, and that ridiculing fascism is a productive thing to do - The Great Dictator was released before the US entered WW 2. Although Chaplin put a lot of work at the end of that movie to make sure everyone knew it was satire and Colbert was a bit less diligent.

      Hm. A bunch of media illiterate conservative dingdongs watched the Colbert report and politics now visually looks like that… but nationalism to it’s extreme tends to look like that and Colbert’s team knew that. Fascism and nationalism look like that and I’m not sure satirizing it normalizes it (in general) but neoliberalism and that ‘working across the aisle’ politics (and journalism) that was also trendy at the time did actively normalize it.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Lemmy seems to be more interested in worshiping its heroes than it is addressing their flaws.

        Go look up what the word normalization means.