What if these were synchronized for a reason and both were groypers?
That’s an interesting idea, but I think it isn’t in the news because school shootings have become so common that nobody (except you) thinks it’s anything but random coincidence.
Ditto for why there’s no Wikipedia entry: it fails the “notability” requirement.
Nobody is a strong word when one has to immediately contradict that in parentheses. That two identical right-wing extremist events occur simultaneously, both of whom appear to have been radicalized by online right-wing disinformation ops — that doesn’t seem beyond the realm of probability let alone possibility. I am also entertaining it; I didn’t say I believe it as fact.
Especially when we know for a fact that far-right extremist violence is the number-one domestic terrorist threat, and that both currently have links to antisemitic ideological groups.
How I wish it failed the “notability” requirement; and yet every other single mass-shooting incident has an entry. So why would you come to think this when this an anomalous outlier?
Thank you for making my point. Either none of them should be, or all of them should be. I tend to believe the latter, since knowledge is power and it is imperative we document political violence by ideology.
That’s an interesting idea, but I think it isn’t in the news because school shootings have become so common that nobody (except you) thinks it’s anything but random coincidence.
Ditto for why there’s no Wikipedia entry: it fails the “notability” requirement.
Nobody is a strong word when one has to immediately contradict that in parentheses. That two identical right-wing extremist events occur simultaneously, both of whom appear to have been radicalized by online right-wing disinformation ops — that doesn’t seem beyond the realm of probability let alone possibility. I am also entertaining it; I didn’t say I believe it as fact.
Especially when we know for a fact that far-right extremist violence is the number-one domestic terrorist threat, and that both currently have links to antisemitic ideological groups.
How I wish it failed the “notability” requirement; and yet every other single mass-shooting incident has an entry. So why would you come to think this when this an anomalous outlier?
Does it? Are you sure they aren’t consolidated into a list, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States_in_2025 or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States_(2000–present)#2025 ? 'Cause I would’ve thought that if every single one had its own Wikipedia page the lists would link to it, but they don’t.
Why then are some “notable” while others are not?
Thank you for making my point. Either none of them should be, or all of them should be. I tend to believe the latter, since knowledge is power and it is imperative we document political violence by ideology.