“This ban is a massive win for Texas ranchers, producers, and consumers,” Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller said in a statement following the bill’s passage. “Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate, and for millions of Texans, it better come from a pasture, not a lab. It’s plain cowboy logic that we must safeguard our real, authentic meat industry from synthetic alternatives.”

Texas joins Indiana, Mississippi, Montana and Nebraska in enacting new laws this year; Alabama and Florida did so last year. In March, the Oklahoma House approved a similar bill that did not advance out of the Senate this session.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The goal is ALWAYS a more PROFITABLE product, with good marketability potential.

    Quality, service, reliability, affordability, etc., are all secondary. It’s nice when they are positive, too, but they can all be compromised for more profit.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yep.

      All that matters is profit.

      And they arent gonna leave profit hanging on the vine by pricing their producting below the product they are competing against, even if their hypothetical costs are 90% less.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Right, which is why if there were more than one company producing lab-grown meat, they would in fact compete against each other.

        Of course, anti-monopoly legislation is rarely enforced in the US, but sometimes it is.