Sounds like a good way to make use of old eMachines, at a large discount too.

Finally, the year of the Linux Desktop! (eMachine edition)

  • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Idk what year that pic was taken, but 2GB of ram is useless no matter what operating system you put on it.

    Except ofc for a home nas, but as a desktop, the user is going to open Firefox, try to open a website, it will take minutes to load and the user just wasted $20

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      More importantly the GPU is going to be unable to process modern graphics which means it will fall to the CPU. The desktop will be very slow and potentially unstable.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      2GB of ram is useless no matter what operating system you put on it.

      Ubuntu 16.04

      This is an old photo

    • Mr.Chewy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean, installing alpine is surprisingly simple and is capable of playing HD youtube by modern standards

      Important note: alpine is black magic and the comparison I’m making is not really sensical if we take into account that one needs at least some terminal knowledge for alpine, let alone install doas instead of sudo (which is bloaty, as it turns out (for alpine stabdards at least))

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a poor spec for a phone, let alone a PC.

      Sometimes it’s best just to scrap it.

      • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        And a reverse image search shows the picture of at least as old as 2017

        Edit: still not enough ram. 4gb, maybe, at a minimum, for this type of thing. Even Linux has it’s limits if you’re trying to get anything done in reasonable time on the modern web

        • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not sure how 2016 era gnome handled low ram, but I can assure you I was browsing the web just fine on an Ubuntu based lxqt machine around that time

    • kalkulat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      After reading that, I just checked my memory. After an hour and a half using FF and and a videoplayer (on a reasonably up-to-date Ubuntu 20.x-based XFCE system), I’m using 2.2GB (out of 16, fairly typical, with no swap). So I’m pretty sure that - depending as always on what software they’ve chosen - 2GB is far from ‘useless’. As always, depends on the use case. That’s plenty if you spend most days in a text editor coding.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I just installed my tenth distro on a 2gb netbook, and they all played games of that era just as well as I remember. Just got done playing a map on dawn of war.

        I don’t expect these things to play cyberpunk 2077, but if you just want to play stardew valley or terraria it is more than sufficient.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      My NAS had 4GB and eventually I maxed it out to 16GB when the pricing for its type of RAM dropped significantly.