The novel and untested approach has been introduced by Democratic lawmakers in at least four states.

Democratic legislators mostly in blue states are attempting to fight back against Donald Trump’s efforts to withhold funding from their states with bills that aim to give the federal government a taste of its own medicine.

The novel and untested approach — so far introduced in Connecticut, Maryland, New York and Wisconsin — would essentially allow states to withhold federal payments if lawmakers determine the federal government is delinquent in funding owed to them. Democrats in Washington state said they are in the process of drafting a similar measure.

These bills still have a long way to go before becoming law, and legal experts said they would face obstacles. But they mark the latest efforts by Democrats at the state level to counter what they say is a massive overreach by the Trump administration to cease providing federal funding for an array of programs that have helped states pay for health care, food assistance and environmental protections.

  • frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Is it not simply a matter of contract anyway? The states agree to pay the federal government in exchange for the security and cooperation that the federation brings. If the federal government is no longer holding up it’s end of that agreement no matter the reason, why should the States be obligated to remain in that agreement?

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I also see it as an honest matter of balance … what they’re budgettary short on from not receiving anymore from the government they must fill from own means that will be deducted from outgoing federal contributions.

      For example Fema is to be dismantled and states need to make their own local disaster funds, meaning less budget to go to the federal government…

      Ofcourse this will be a sour pill for the maga government and they’ll use the SC to thwart it and enforce full payments to the federal government if they can get away with it.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well legally, because that agreement simply declared the new situation. There’s no exit clause, it’s just how things are now.

      Morally, nothing. Fuck the federal government. We technically deleted the first, the articles of confederation, we can delete this one.