Do not make yourself a target and a danger when the threat against you is just shitty laws that benefit the wealthy.
Bold of you to assume that’s the only threat.
Do not make yourself a target and a danger when the threat against you is just shitty laws that benefit the wealthy.
Bold of you to assume that’s the only threat.
Bold of you to assume they will bother looking at the papers.
Lay eggs, mostly.
To be fair, NIPR sucks at everything.
Your position is that Florida is more Alabama than Alabama?
You are making the bold assumption that Republicans give a damn about not appearing hypocritical.
My layman’s understanding is that if you say you committed murder 20 years ago, but your therapist doesn’t believe you are actually a clear, present, and immediate danger to yourself or others, they don’t actually have to report it. I find it hard to believe that there would be a situation where someone could admit to something like that and the therapist doesn’t think they are at a reasonable likelihood to reoffend, but I guess the potential for the situation exists.
The link above is specific to Florida, but I’m sure that there are differences in law in different jurisdictions and probably even specifics at the federal level.
I am neither a lawyer nor a therapist, just a shitposter, so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I’m struggling to think why this would be a thing. The only guess I have is someone was told to enforce “no dictionary words in a password” and saw that as an ‘easier’ way to implement?
Easily? Pray tell.
Consumables only. Problem solved.
It is possible for two people in a situation to both make poor decisions.