Ethically you can make as many digital or physical personal copies as you want for yourself outside of perhaps a concern for wasting resources but if you sell them you’re taking away earnings from an author or rights holder or owner which may each have different moral weight and require recognition of property rights as a thing worth having. But if you’re caught with hundreds or thousands of copies or copies where they are easily accessible to the public it’s going to appear pretty suspicious.

You’re right, I thought it was hold not elected.

If they followed the law as written it would go to the next person in order of succession, the congressional house speaker, because he would be ineligible to hold the office after the second term.

Not just fast food, chains and franchises in general. Local only may be more of a quality gamble when trying things out but when you find that unassuming diner or small restaurant that takes pride in their daily soups, and doesn’t do delivery or apps, and closes at reasonable times for their workers, and is usually packed on weekends, you’ve found something special.

Of course, let’s not let things like knowledge or consequences get in the way of reactionary & spiteful arrogance informed only by propaganda induced fear and hate, emotions know to prevent rational thought /s

There’s also a bug I think with deleted comments taking days to actually be removed from visibility in several clients, I can still see it in sync and probably will continue to for at least a day or two

Alt: Mural in Lithuania of Putin and Trump making out

This is literally what organized crime does, it’s like the cops for criminals.

deleted by creator

Alt: idiot and ex-president George Bush Jr who helped Trump achieve a position of vast power pointing out how weird he was acting at the swearing in in 2017

If roughly is within one standard deviation from average then most of the population is roughly average and half are below and half are above

Maybe, but I think it may also be possible they mean the same thing but from different perspectives or maybe whether you are willing to cross some line like dying or killing for a cause. There was a disagreement around 100 years ago when WW2 ended between philosophers Sartre and Camus about how to be free and whether violence and murder can be justified for political goals. Camus supported the French in WW2 but did not support political violence outside of war, in The Rebel he rejects revolutionary violence as it undermines/betrays yourself and is utopian and absolutist. Sartre thought violence could be justified for the right cause like communism to build and maintain a system for justice and freedom until it was obvious the tankies had taken over during the revolution reaction in Hungary. Sartre became an apologist for Soviet revolutionary violence until '56 and Camus was an advocate for nonviolent rebellion. I don’t know what the answer is or if there is one.

What is the difference between a rebel and a revolutionary?

Add https://ffrf.org/ to the list, I don’t suspect overturning Roe v Wade is the only change they are going to make that preferences faith based beliefs and feelings over objective reason backed by scientific evidence.

I’m a lumberjack in Antarctica when I’m not moonlighting as a future historian.

Reminds me of a line from Community: “You’re more like a fun vampire, instead of sucking blood you just suck.”

It’s also a violation of his probation, check with his probate officer when the warrant will be issued

We should be exploring both options, exploration can often lead to unexpected discoveries and technological advancement.

Also Canada is the number 1 producer of potassium in the world, massive potash mines up in Saskatchewan