Can’t wait for the Captain Moses prequel and, Armageddon: Endgame.

And literally nothing came of it, this whole thing is fear mongering and political theater.

Try OpenWRT

That’s just because I’m using a pH from Like 2008 and it has progressively stupid autocorrect.

Even when I correct it if I don’t spacial go to the next would and then do back it will change what I said.

As an example I just left this how it wasn’t me too.

We do have more than one type of water, D₂0, HD0, HT0, T₂0, DTO, which are all different mixtures of Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium or in other words the hydrogen has more neutrons, there is also a different ionization for each of those, plus there are different phases of ice which are made from different pressure that is ice I-VII, and it’s not impossible for more types we don’t know about, then there is isotopic water that have different mass and reaction rates and it’s not impossible for other types that we just don’t know about or even to create other types.

Tldr: atoms and molecules are more varied and complex than you’d think.

Water-Gull. Earth-Gull. Fire-Gull. Air-Gull. Long ago, the four nations lived together in harmony. Then, everything changed when the Fire-Gull Nation attacked.

As long as you can’t hear the first one.

We’ve had this technology for decades, Disney even had something planned around it so you could sit around and have your phone magically charge, for Disney specifically the problem was that it would build up dangerous amounts of electricity making normal objects deadly but more broadly the problem is that it is ungodly inefficient, like I’m talking exponentially inefficient, electricity follows the square cubed law, meaning for every one unit you move away from the source you loose 3/4 of your original energy.

You forgot your click bait YouTube thumbnail:

Therapists agree Money Can Buy happiness 😲

Lies 100x and Damned lies.

It was only ~33x

First off chemtrails are very much based on reality, it is called cloud seeding and was used during the Cold war to alter the weather of Vietnam an incredibly controversial event at the time, one might say a government coverup.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye

Second, the Gay Bomb (The thing he was ranting about at the time)was an actual non-lethal measure they were working on and the only reason it doesn’t exist is because it is most likely impossible, he went off on a tangent about putting chemicals in the water that makes the Frogs gay and that is most likely incorrect simply because there is no reason and it would probably be noticed by now, but I wouldn’t put anything past the government, and just because this specific conspiracy theorie is most likely bunk doesn’t mean they like, the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr, that is all but proved to be a CIA opp.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bomb

This isn’t nearly as funny when you learn that we are infact putting medication in our water from unused medicine and industrial runoff that can alter the sex characteristics of amphibians including Frogs

Or if you want a catchy technically inaccurate but conveys the same message catch phrase:

We’re putting chemicals in the water that makes the frogs gay.

Given DVD’s and analog in general is dead this isn’t very relevant, I suppose some hypothetical past people might have been slightly upset but that’s past me problem and he was always a dick to me anyways.

Ama bout to score me a free copy of XP 😏

EDIT: Fixed grammar with AI.

The word deviant doesn’t have a concrete meaning in scientific terms.

So, no—objectively speaking, gay people are not “deviant,” since morality is a human construct. (And even if it weren’t, that would be a philosophical question.)

The best way I could reframe this question is:

A. Are we evolutionarily predisposed to find people with alternative* sexual preferences distasteful or unpleasant?

B. Are alternative* sexual preferences evolutionarily harmful to society?

C. Are alternative* sexual preferences harmful to an individual’s own evolutionary success?

D. If any of the above are true, is the psychological or societal damage so detrimental—either to the individual or to society—that it would still be preferable to engage in alternative* sexual desires?

In this context, “alternative” refers to anything outside of a heterosexual relationship. However, these questions can be narrowed down to whatever specific sexual preferences you are inquiring about.

I won’t offer my own opinion on this, nor will I present any scientific evidence. But I will say this: I don’t think the issue is as black and white as some might assume.

You should always Question everything, If someone tells you not to question it, question it Harder.

If it is the Truth then it doesn’t matter if you Question it or not, and nobody should care if you question it

If it’s a Lie, then You need to know why you’re being lied to, you need to know who benefits from it, you need to know if the Lie was worth suppression of the Truth.

If your life is truly better with the Lie it is always better to know and make that decision for yourself, never let others dictate what you believe because it is better for them, If you are going to follow a Lie make sure it is in your best interest. Because anyone will tell you a lie to help themselves but no one will willingly work against their own self interest.

I would set up A shop to sell stuff, AI don’t got no money.

If that was the case then why did they make a final destination 3? Because it turned out that wasn’t the real final destination turned out the 5th destination was the final destination.