So it’s way harder if you don’t.

Conservatism is about making it illegal for the rest of the world to exist in a manner other than the one that you personally want it to.

Single issue voters for something like abortion?

Or just not single issue voters for climate change.

Given that the Republicans have adopted the stance that it’s not real and/or not our fault, I think it still counts as political. Even if it shouldn’t be.

Does she have a proposal for how to do that?

You believe freaking ecologists for crying our loud!

Are you implying that ecology is a less valid field than physics?

…Where’s the book title?

You can’t expect your opponent to do your research for you.

Or uneducated. Or actively denying reality. Some combination of the three.

But only one party has any interest in doing something about it.

Social science does.

Which, of course, puts you at a competitive disadvantage compared to those who use cheaper but less green tech. Which just goes to show why we need regulation.

Only if it actually contributes to stopping climate change.

Assuming that all the same people answered both questions.