

This question is redundant. Evil people choose the evil option, normal people choose the other.
This question is redundant. Evil people choose the evil option, normal people choose the other.
Why does nobody consider the plight of the humble billionaires?
Musk be shitting brix
If you ask copilot to return a directory tree using MATLAB script it writes a function using a for loop and about 20 lines of code. Meanwhile the documentation defines this task as
dir(“*”)
Xi and Putin discussing organ transplants and immorality
This was my situation exactly. I knew that antidepressants only treated the symptoms but the underlying condition isn’t addressed. I was buying ADHD medication on the dark web and that stuff actually worked. Ended up going to a psychiatrist and paying for a diagnosis. Honestly amongst the best decisions I have ever made. Many of my life outcomes made sense when viewed through the lens of ADHD. The project for the remainder of my life is undoing the damage that was done in the first 47 years.
You hate to see it
It’s an unusual gift and would make most people incredibly awkward but there’s nothing sinister in the act itself, absent of the context. People gift things like guns and alcohol and I would argue those do more harm.
Alternative name, Eigen Values
Because white guys.
Shopping trolleys are a rich source of materials for the aspiring welding fabricator. Road signs can also be good but they get banged around.
I’m confused, I thought they didn’t like each other? Almost as if it’s all fake sentiment and the real game is the corporate sponsorship. Watching Obama yuck it up with Trump lately was a slap in face. Holy shit, could it be any more obvious. You already have alternatives to the status quo, just vote for them.
First past the post is not democracy, it’s kleptocracy.
Is this mostly a ADHD thing? They tried to make me learn times tables at school but that never stuck. Recently had to solve a problem with a CRC and part of that was manually calculating a long division in binary. At some point realised I didn’t even know how to do that in decimal so wound the clock back 35 years and learnt it from scratch. Badda bing badda boom, working CRC 🤓
I would not argue against that. Two steps forward and one back is usually how it goes with technology. Reliability is the problem that has only been achieved relatively recently. I remember a time when the hard shoulder was full of stalled vehicles. Japanese cars from the 70s and 80s were notably inferior to their competitors. We’ve come a long way in making this technology polished and affordable to the masses. Now the science shows us it is contributing to climate change and we have a new challenge. So it goes.
Car companies hate this one trick.
I would argue that it is already the case that cheap cars look and perform excellently, compared with cars produced fifty years ago. They are more reliable, economical, comfortable, higher performance, superior in virtually every respect.
The other factor to consider is the use case. Something like a Ferrari is not reliable compared to a VW Golf, it sucks at carrying passengers and cargo, terrible fuel economy, it is horrible value for money and inferior in most ways apart from one - compensating for a small penis. That is its chief purpose and it is supremely well crafted for this use case.
Source: automotive engineer of 25 years.
Eat my shorts
Rest in piss