As I have said many times: license washing works both ways, this is the end of proprietary software as we know it, no more would I have a need to install a sketchy driver inside a windows VM just to use some crap USB microscope

kill computers

what did the artist draw this on then?

you can do the opensource thing and fork it to remove the features you dont like.

also i have not looked at the src myself but its main purpose is use with local llms which can be reduced to mean: all your generated and collected data stays on your device.

eh whatever I will humor you; why? why not have have a healthy discussion regarding this, this zero tolerance policy should be reserved for extreme content not thrown around willy nilly

What is fully human written and how are you as a human(I assume) able to distinguish between what is laboriously typed and what is generated, here lets try this exercise and see if you can spot any difference Here is a code I have typed by hand

"smash":
        push    rbp
        mov     rbp, rsp
        call    "smash"
        pop     rbp
        ret

and here is machine generated code with the prompt, the slop machine used here is a compiler

GCC take this C code void smash(){smash();} and make it executable and here is the output

"smash":
        push    rbp
        mov     rbp, rsp
        call    "smash"
        nop
        pop     rbp
        ret

My mind is to ban it to preserve open source.

You will be preserving it alright, but not progressing it in anyway; A blanket ban wont really solve anything, a more sophisticated system would be a pinned comment warning of AI use, which you should eventually rescind if the author proves they have not abandoned the project when their tokens ran out

The California governor described White House reporters as ‘sycophants’

we call em ‘Lapdog media’ where i’m from, i guess y’all should call them ‘Rump media’.

`09 shitbox FTW

Do elaborate more on the 3D printing stuff

The assertion that lemmy users call Blockchain and AI a grift is not without evidence(just browse around on any thread related to the topic) people calling QC a grift is more nuanced and something I have picked up on, you could make the case when ‘it happens’ lemmites would call QC a grift.

people will say QC is a grift when it eventually becomes commercially viable(Just look at the second level comments here)

thats why I think there should be a fsf led effort to make some version of FOSS agentic AI(i know its just a marketing term).

I hate that the ability to just sit at the computer and go

Hey, can you go through the hundreds of images i have in my Downloads folder, and transfer the images in which i appear in the center to this directory, also make it so in the future any pdf with a specific header goes into this directory will M$ exclusive feature.

amen

didn’t meta and apple try turning VR into the ‘Next big thing’ very recently, i mean they got distracted with LLMs but they could always try again.

I still dont think blockchain; the tech itself is a grift, it does what it promised to do(not BTC, other coins that improved on it, BTC itself has turned into a big game of chicken), has uses beyond its initial purpose. Its just that the tech attracted grifters like flies, and their actions were transparent(yet people still fell for it)

I am not against any of the tech i listed, i think they all are neat and quite interesting to study and use.

you have probably not been around the forums to realise why i put it there, QC discussion these days are leaning towards the it’s a grift/ it will never be viable territory. This is mostly in large part due to M$ and their claims. there is also some subtle fear mongering going on with the recent push towards quantam resistant encryption standards.

So i am not calling QC a grift, I am calling out that whenever it becomes viable for the companies that are researching it to rent their computers to consumers, people will start calling it the next grift.

wasn’t there a recent fiasco regarding some company called donut and their so called solidstate battery?

So what innovation would socialism turn into a grift?

Vegetarianism in India is more nuanced then that; I personally see it in 4 different facets.

one is that it is the Upper Caste’s(who traditionally have more access to wealth) enforcing their values(religious requirement to be a vegetarian) on people who they see as below them.

Many poor people in India disproportionately eat more meat than their richer counter parts.

Animal protein is just cheaper and more dense than plant based protein, and plant based protein is also seasonal as compared to animal based protein.

It also doesn’t help that vegetarianism has become a political issue in India, and is part of the ongoing culture wars happening in the country.

This is one of the threads of all time!

not exactly surprising that we are hearing more stories/examples of AI induced delusions in people, but it really makes me wonder if there was a concerted effort to kill news stories related to AI doubling down when incorrect.

No AI(LLMs) just got better, more accurately they got better at detecting they are incorrect and correcting themselves.

If you want to sort of grasp how it works, just search up the Chatgpt seahorse emoji debacle, arguably the best example of what happens when deep training data fights with the self-check logic.