Too many labels out there. Ask me my opinion on any issue and I will tell you honestly. I took a quiz once and it said I was a filthy socialist.


Are you implying that he would eat one and then suffer a heart attack?


Really pissed because about a year ago in february it upgraded without my informed consent and I never noticed until something else bad happened. You can only downgrade if you notice within a week.
It’s real fuckin insidious, I had already reformatted my PC once too recently so I juuuust kinda toughed it out.
Anyways, they keep everything same-ish which prevents you from noticing they changed your whole OS which should be illegal.
Rich people absolutely get addicted to drugs. They just have sufficient resources that it doesn’t affect their lives as detrimentally in many cases. Elon is up to his eyeballs in ketamine on a given day.


I like it because it reminds me that Charlie Kirk is dead.
I used to have a marble collection but I’ve lost track of its position. You could say…
I miss when “worse than Hitler” was something patently untrue that people said when they were being overly dramatic.


It’s a fair probabilistic inference in my eyes. If even a small percentage of the things we have an extremely high confidence he did happened. I wouldn’t put this past him either.


I want a large country with no ice


It’s pretty interesting to see them do that given the fact that you just know that these files aren’t gone.
The official source is gone but a few thousand people probably downloaded that PDF.


It’s deeply fucked, there are publicly circulating screenshots that on their own are pretty damning evidence that individuals including but not limited to top billionaires and public officials traipsed on over to pedophile goddamn island and partied with quantities of drugs that we literally know because they kept inventory.
Nowhere near the number of people who we have confirmation were involved have been arrested.
So it’s like goddamn now what do I do? I am to say the least very upset.
I don’t even know what my protest sign should say anymore, “I WOULD NEED A MUCH LARGER SIGN TO DISPLAY ALL THE CAUSES I AM CURRENTLY AGITATED ABOUT”?


I’ve never been severely injured enough for it to be seriously dangerous to my health as far as I’m aware but I would get the shit beaten out of me instantaneously and probably start bleeding from the mouth because I would definitely count getting my wisdom teeth ripped out.


You don’t need to AI generate pictures of ice agents being fat sacks of shit because they are and you can back that with hard evidence.


Crazy that he gets away with the number of people he’s just, straight up declined to pay.
You’d think after some point either
But that never happened, somehow.


Trump bankrupted a Casino, a business that by its very nature should be virtually impossible to sink.
Casinos have an initial cost to open, they have some costs to run, but their chief interest is People who have a problem where they give away too much of their money to try to win big, give you all their money, occasionally you have to give a fraction back so it feels less as if the house always wins.
Claiming that all textiles should be derived exclusively from plants oversimplifies the ecological tradeoffs involved. Animal fibers, particularly wool, are not a major driver of environmental harm compared to many common alternatives.
Wool production relies on sheep that have been selectively bred over centuries to continuously grow fleece. For most modern breeds, regular shearing is not optional; without it, the animals are at risk of heat stress, impaired mobility, skin infections, and parasitic infestations. Shearing itself is not inherently harmful when done correctly and is a routine husbandry practice required for animal welfare rather than an exploitative excess.
There are documented cases of escaped domestic sheep accumulating extreme amounts of fleece over time, resulting in serious health detriment for the animal. These cases illustrate that wool removal is not merely convenient for humans but necessary for animals that can no longer self-regulate their coats in the wild.
From a materials perspective, wool has several environmental advantages. It is biodegradable, long lasting, naturally insulating, odor-resistant, and flame retardant without chemical treatment. In contrast, most synthetic textiles shed microplastics during washing and wear, contributing persistently to aquatic and terrestrial pollution. Even plant based fibers often require intensive land use, water consumption, pesticides, and chemical processing, particularly for crops like cotton.
This of course does not mean wool production is impact free. Poor land management, overgrazing, and methane emissions are real concerns and should be addressed through better agricultural practices rather than ignored. However, when evaluated relative to synthetic textiles and many industrial plant fibers, responsibly produced wool is among the lower-impact options available for clothing. I read that bamboo fiber actually takes an immense amount of water to produce for example.
The broader point I’m trying to establish is that ecological harm is not determined solely by whether a fiber is animal or plant derived.
Durability, biodegradability, land use, chemical inputs, and pollution across the full lifecycle matter more than origin alone. A blanket rejection of animal fibers risks replacing a relatively low-impact material with alternatives that cause greater long-term environmental damage.


Isn’t it just great that we’re in such a place and time where an official message from the federal government has me saying yeah I don’t believe a word of that
He can have a post presidential rest in peace…