Nice. I really like this. Thank you!

Great. I would like to be able to do that.

Danke Merkel!

I need a sabbatical. Canada maybe or New Zealand. A retreat to a monastery also sounds nice. I will rebuild an old farm house. Something along these lines. :)

It doesn’t have to be the truth, or does it?

What the fork?

Some people are just one hit wonders, so it could be für nothing. But it would be worth a try.

It’s definitively better than to give the idea of nuclear fission to Henry Cavendish in 1766. Right now we live in the sweet spot between discovery and… broad practical application.

To Biff Tannen

(I’m sorry)

I proposed an extension of the feature set. The current behaviour is still possible. You can use the added feature but you don’t have to.

The issue for me: The current landscape in lemmy has a lot of sparsely filled groups - I do not browse by group (filter by subscribed or all and sorted by new or hot).
In this view multiple identical posts with distributed replies are shown. This adds redundancy in the comments and reduces clarity.

Edit: The idea rises the question, how the ownership (or relation) of a post to the group and its replies should be handled. Using an x-post-like approach is just one idea.

Allow multiple groups per post (use them like tags). This would have some interesting implications regarding moderation and the handling of replies to the said post.

Having multiple identical posts in different groups with distributed replies doesn’t feel ideal to me.

So many orphaned comments and no post. Strange.

That means someone at NASA made an effort to search for eclipse events on Mars visible by Perseverance and put the right wheels inside the organisation in motion so that they made the rover make a photo of the sun (and deimos). Nice.

That’s something I can agree on, sometimes. Sometimes, because for me there can be too much sleep.

Fuzzy dream world: someone said dreaming is just a different form of consciousness (but with sensory stimuli other than seeing and hearing.) Um…

No, everything is fine with the depiction of the sleep mask. :)

I wanted to say that the division into ignorant sleepers and elitist know-it-alls seems too simple and one-dimensional to me.

Choose the right tool for the job. There are even more types of goggles. I.e:

It’s wrentastic at posing, that I’m sure of.

threw out

But it was thrown in. 🤔

Source

This is due to a structure in the back of the eye called the tapetum lucidum. This is a reflective layer in the back of the eye that sits just in front of the blood filled layer called the choroid. The job of this layer of the eye is to reflect light back onto the retina a second time to amplify light in dark conditions. The color of the tapetum and its reflection can vary from a green, blue, orange or yellow hue. This coloration often changes over the first 3 months of life. Some dogs, similar to humans, do not have a tapetum. This is most common in dogs with blue eyes. Thus, when a photograph is taken, the tapetum is not present to create the colored reflection and therefore the red blood vessels in the back of the eye are visualized. This creates the “red eye” look.

Interesting. So your dog is night blind in one eye?

If you notice a change in how your dog’s eyes are reflecting over time (duller or brighter) or there is a difference in the reflection between eyes, it is advisable to have the eyes examined. It could indicate an eye disease that needs to be addressed.

Hmm. Nah.

You missed the opportunity to get super powers. Your loss. ;)

To be fair. In a developed country with free health care the doctor probably would have either sent him home to sleep it off or maybe to a specialist where it takes months to get an appointment.

Good. He is at the right place for that.