• Chastity2323@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The Gates Foundation backpedaled that stance shortly after

    can you provide a source for this?

    Their initial objection was over quality assurance

    Who is he to decide this? He is not an epidemiologist or a public health expert or a leader of a low-resource nation or even a health professional. He’s a tech billionaire. This is exactly the problem.

    Many large US companies, including pharmaceutical drug retailers, directly invest in the Gates Foundation Trust, creating a massive conflict of interest which is rarely talked about.

    https://healthscienceandlaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Public-Interest-Position.WHO_.FENSAGates.Jan2017.pdf

    https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/science/16malaria.html

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The Gates Foundation backpedaled that stance shortly after

      can you provide a source for this?

      Literally the first search result LINK

      Who is he to decide this?

      He was cohosting the multinational committee event for Gavi, a vaccine alliance which includes the WHO ans UNICEFF. He is widely respected there because he runs an organization which spent decades of providing medicines and vaccines across the globe.

      • Chastity2323@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Literally the first search result LINK

        This appears to be just a statement of support for “narrow” patent waviers during the pandemic. This is not the same as open licensing the Oxford vaccine and calling this “backpedaling” is misleading at best.