• franpoli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Russia remains a key supplier of resources critical to U.S. industry (titanium, palladium, uranium). While technically replaceable, developing alternative sources would take years. This makes the current moment less than ideal for imposing higher tariffs on Russia, particularly when the priority is to reindustrialize the U.S.

    • learningduck@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I find it funny than instead of at least imposing 10% tariff by default on Russia and selectively exempt critical resources. Russian wasn’t listed at all.

      Even an unoccupied island got 10% tariff by default.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      now explain why Russia is uniquely in this position or i user note you as a russian agent

      • franpoli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Well, as much as I’d love a dramatic spy backstory, I’m afraid I’m neither an FSB nor an FBI agent. Just a regular person thinking out loud. I don’t have a definitive answer, just some suppositions. I share them so we can all explore the topic with arguments and counterarguments; no secret dossiers required! Open to hearing different perspectives.