Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWait, why is the White House using Starlink to ‘improve Wi-Fi’?www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1388arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1384arrow-down1external-linkWait, why is the White House using Starlink to ‘improve Wi-Fi’?www.theverge.comTony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square50fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoMay be that official comms are MITMed by the three letters, as they should be, and they need a secure channel to commit treason on.
minus-squarerumba@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year ago , as they should be, and they need a secure channel to commit treason on. This is the $64,000 answer. It gives them a private, unmonitored channel to contact their handlers. It also gives their handlers a private channel to touch their network. Wonder if there are any zerodays in starlinks config…
May be that official comms are MITMed by the three letters, as they should be, and they need a secure channel to commit treason on.
This is the $64,000 answer. It gives them a private, unmonitored channel to contact their handlers.
It also gives their handlers a private channel to touch their network.
Wonder if there are any zerodays in starlinks config…