Summary

The ACLU filed a federal lawsuit challenging President Trump’s executive order to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. if their parents are unlawfully present or have temporary legal status.

The order, set to take effect in 30 days, conflicts with the 14th Amendment, which guarantees birthright citizenship, upheld by the Supreme Court in 1898.

Critics argue the order creates a “subclass” of noncitizens, undermining fairness and equality.

The lawsuit seeks to block the order, which also directs agencies to stop issuing passports and recognizing affected children as citizens.

  • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 个月前

    Well, except diplomats or foreign heads of state. That’s the point of the language. A queen can’t birth a prince here and he be eligible for the presidency down the road.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 个月前

      But unless they’re in their consulate, they’re on US soil, subject to the US

      Edit: was totally wrong

      • mriguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 个月前

        Nope. Even off of consulate grounds, diplomatic immunity holds. It wouldn’t be worth much if you were trapped in the embassy.

      • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 个月前

        Sure, if they, e.g., murder someone and their home country waives diplomatic immunity, but otherwise they will just be sent home and possibly be charged there.

        • nieminen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 个月前

          This is cool, I totally misunderstood what the immunity provided. Thanks for pointing it out. Read the wiki page on it after your comment.