vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoTrump classified documents judge is target of more than 1,000 complaints, appeals court revealswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkTrump classified documents judge is target of more than 1,000 complaints, appeals court revealswww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoCan you expand more on the election interference part? Totally understand inciting an insurrection to be interference, but using campaign funds to manage public relations problems seems a legitimate use.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoSo the falsifying is the illegal bit. The rest of the tweet is moralising.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoYeah, if he was upfront about things then there would be no criminal case However saying he set up shell companies to carry out falsification isn’t moralising
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoWriting “disgusting transactions” is moralistic. Doesn’t help to win over Republicans.
minus-squaressladam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 years agoI think you misread. He said “disguising”, which only means intent to keep hidden by masking the truth.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoThe only disgusting (immoral) part of this is Trump cheating on his wife. Everything else could have been achieved perfectly legally (i.e. without disgust) if Trump had been smart. I don’t want to disgust you, but “intending to keep things hidden by masking the truth” is practically the definition of politics.
minus-squaresuction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 years agoDude, you have trouble reading. It says “disguising”. Your side really fails at the most basic human functions, over and over again.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoAnd finding something disgusting is a moral position.
Can you expand more on the election interference part?
Totally understand inciting an insurrection to be interference, but using campaign funds to manage public relations problems seems a legitimate use.
So the falsifying is the illegal bit.
The rest of the tweet is moralising.
Yeah, if he was upfront about things then there would be no criminal case
However saying he set up shell companies to carry out falsification isn’t moralising
Writing “disgusting transactions” is moralistic.
Doesn’t help to win over Republicans.
I think you misread. He said “disguising”, which only means intent to keep hidden by masking the truth.
The only disgusting (immoral) part of this is Trump cheating on his wife.
Everything else could have been achieved perfectly legally (i.e. without disgust) if Trump had been smart.
I don’t want to disgust you, but “intending to keep things hidden by masking the truth” is practically the definition of politics.
Dude, you have trouble reading. It says “disguising”. Your side really fails at the most basic human functions, over and over again.
And finding something disgusting is a moral position.